The UN Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights, Philip Alston, is preparing a thematic report to the UN General Assembly on the human rights impacts, especially on those living in poverty, of the introduction of digital technologies in the implementation of national social protection systems. The report will be presented to the General Assembly in New York in October 2019.
Colleagues from across the third sector and from the SDGs network are invited to share their case studies and examples here. This page will form the basis of the SCVO submission to the UN Special Rapporteur. Please share any case studies and contributions by Thursday the 9th of May 2019.
The Scottish Council for Voluntary Organisations (SCVO), our members, and the wider third sector welcome the exploration by the UN Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights, Philip Alston, into the human rights impacts, especially on those living in poverty, of the introduction of digital technologies in the implementation of national social protection systems.
Our response has been developed openly with input from the Scottish third sector:
Key concerns include:
*The deeply flawed Universal Credit system which pushes people into poverty, debt, and crisis
*The digital divide which can be a barrier to those accessing social security systems
SCVO, would welcome the opportunity to arrange a webinar between the Rapporteur and our members to discuss these concerns, the wider concerns of the sector, and to share how the many communities the third sector work with experience digital exclusion and poverty and the impact of this upon their human rights.
===Internet access and social security===
In 2016 the UN declared access to broadband to be a basic right. Without internet access in the home individuals have limited access to public services, channels for civic and democratic participation, knowledge and information tools, opportunities for social engagement, the labour market, and learning opportunities. Despite this, many individuals and households in Scotland and the UK cannot afford the devices and connections needed to benefit from the advantages the internet offers.
Home internet access varies considerably by household income. In 2017, 66% of households in Scotland with an income of £15,000 or less had home internet access rising to 99% in households with incomes over £40,000 (Scottish Household Survey, 2017). Additionally, only 71% of social housing tenants have home internet access, compared to 90% of home owners and 88% of private rented tenants. Older people, those with disabilities, and those in social housing or on low incomes are all more likely to be digitally excluded. While there is limited gender-disaggregated data for barriers to internet access in Scotland, [https://www.engender.org.uk/ Engender] highlight that there is a clear correlation between low online participation and other areas of deprivation which are highly gendered. Women, for example, are the majority of older people, working-age people living in poverty, and lone parents. Women are also twice as dependent on social security as men, with 20% of women’s income coming from the benefits and tax credit system, compared with 10% of men’s. Individuals with lower levels of literacy, poor digital skills, or for whom English is not there first language also face additional barriers. The people and communities most likely to be supported by public services are therefore also those most likely to be digitally excluded. Despite this, both the UK and Scottish Governments' are increasingly moving services online. The Department for Work and Pensions, for example, planned for 80% of Universal Credit applications to be completed online by 2017 as part of a transition towards digital only services.
SCVO, Mydex, Engender, Inclusion Scotland, CPAG Scotland and others across the Scottish third sector recognise that the digitalisation of public services can simplify and integrate services. Public services, however, must be accessible to all. To achieve this the varied needs of public services users must be central to the development of social security protections and supported by initiatives to ensure that everyone can use and access their right to social security. Equal access to digital services is essential to reduce inequalities and poverty and ensure both SDG and human rights commitments are fulfilled. Both the UK and Scottish Governments' therefore have a duty to overcome any digital, legal, financial, or administrative challenges that fail to fulfil the right to social security.
In 2010 the UK's Department for Work & Pensions introduced Universal Credit (UC) to replace six means-tested benefits for working-age households. Universal Credit aimed to: improve the incentive to work; make entitlements simpler; reduce fraud and error; and reduce the costs of administering entitlements. The original completion date for UC was October 2017, however, after considerable technical challenges in implementing UC, including problems managing the programme and developing the necessary technology, this date has been moved back repeatedly. It is currently anticipated that when Full Service rollout is complete in 2023, 652,500 people in Scotland will be claim their entitlement to Universal Credit.
The Department continues to expect an additional 200,000 people to move into work because of UC, saving £99 million a year in the administration of entitlements (National Audit Office, 2018). A reduction in fraud and error is expected to save £1.3 billion a year (National Audit Office, 2018). These savings largely rely upon the Department moving away from costly ways of administering claims—such as telephone and in-person support—towards a single digital claim service and digital channels of communication. By June 2018, the National Audit Office found that the Department had invested £1.3 billion creating Universal Credit while spending £600 million on running costs. Currently, the cost of administering each UC claim is £699 and while it is forecast that this will fall to £173 per claim by 2024/2025, the National Audit Office highlight that planned efficiency savings are uncertain. Similarly, the extent to which UC has and will reduce fraud and error is unknown and measuring the increase in people in work as a result of the entitlement difficult.
The entitlement has, however, resulted in an increase in rent arrears for local authorities, housing associations and landlords; and late payments for one in five claimants. While a five week wait for the first payment of the entitlement is built into the system and UC is limited to the first two children in each family. The Child Poverty Action Group report, [http://www.cpag.org.uk/sites/default/files/Computer%20says%20%27no%21%27%20Stage%20one%20-%20information%20provision_2.pdf Computer Says No!] also highlights that the reliance on automated decision making for financial support calculations has also resulted in errors in decision making and adds an added layer of complexity for individuals trying to understand the payments they receive. This problem is exacerbated by the lack of accessible information provided to people accessing their entitlement.
SCVO, CPAG Scotland, Inclusion Scotland, the Scottish Federation of Housing Associations (SFHA), Scottish Women's Aid, and members of the Scottish Campaign for Welfare Reform (SCoWR), and many others across the third sector and civil society believe that UC has and will have far reaching consequences for people’s economic and social rights, worsening poverty for many. UC can and should protect people from and poverty its consequences. To achieve this there is an urgent need to listen to those claiming UC and redesign elements that simply aren't working.
Computer Says No! (2019). Child Poverty Action Group, http://www.cpag.org.uk/sites/default/files/Computer%20says%20%27no%21%27%20Stage%20one%20-%20information%20provision_2.pdf
===='''Case study 1: Online claims and disabled people:'''====
Individuals claiming UC, including disabled people, are initially signposted to the self-service online channel, other channels are used as an exception. While telephone claims can be completed where appropriate Inclusion Scotland has found that this happens very rarely. All claimants are also required to maintain their claim online, other than in exceptional circumstances. These changes have impacted people and communities across Scottish society and disabled people are particularly vulnerable to the requirements of digital by default services.
Disabled people are the group in society that are least likely to have internet access. The 2015 Scottish Household Survey found that over one in three (35%) of disabled people in Scotland did not access or use the internet at all. In comparison, over 90% of the non-disabled population have and use an internet connection. People without qualifications, with low levels of literacy and/or living on low incomes (47%) are least likely to have internet access and disabled people are over-represented in each of those groups. Those who are out of work are also less likely than those in work to have internet access and over half (57%) of disabled people in Scotland are workless. People without qualifications, with low levels of literacy and on a low income are also those most likely to be without work and claiming entitlements.
Similarly, those with learning difficulties, both congenital and acquired (e.g. through brain injury, oxygen deprivation at birth, etc.) and those with learning impairments (such as dyslexia) are amongst those most likely to have no qualifications. But even those disabled people with physical/sensory impairments and no learning difficulties are more likely to leave school with no qualifications. In Scotland, disabled people are more than twice as likely as non-disabled people to have no qualifications (26% as opposed to 10%).
However, it is not just disabled people who lack internet access who might have difficulty making and maintaining a claim online. Inclusion Scotland highlight that even those who do occasionally access the internet (perhaps using social media) but who also have learning difficulties; communication difficulties, visual or physical impairments, may still have difficulty in completing lengthy, complex online entitlement application forms.
In a survey of benefits and tax credits recipients, 45% of participants said that they would need support to claim and manage their claim online (DWP, 2012). Similarly a survey by Glasgow Citizens Advice Bureaux published in 2015 found that over 75% of those using CAB services would require such assistance. The DWP Universal Support offer, to be delivered by Citizens Advice from 2019–20, includes a single session of digital support for each claimant, intended to help them to claim their entitlement online. The House of Commons Work and Pensions Committee conclude in there report on ''Universal Support'' that this is insufficient to address the challenges that many claimants face in using UC’s digital systems. DWP have said that they will provide face-to-face support to complete online forms in “exceptional” circumstances. Inclusion Scotland have found that in practice, very few disabled people receive such support and DWP staff have little knowledge or understanding of the online access problems faced by disabled people. For example, it is not possible to “train” someone to overcome a learning difficulty simply by showing them how to use a computer.
Inclusion Scotland have found that as a consequence of these issues disabled people have experienced significant delays in UC payments and, in some cases, been subjected to sanctions, causing severe hardship undermining the right to access social security and an adequate standard of living.
Scottish Household Survey (2015)
Scottish Household Survey (2017). https://www.gov.scot/publications/scotlands-people-annual-report-results-2017-scottish-household-survey/pages/8/
Work and the welfare system: a survey of benefits and tax credits recipients (2012) DWP <nowiki>http://research.dwp.gov.uk/asd/asd5/rports2011-2012/rrep800.pdf</nowiki>
Internet Access in Deprived areas (2015). Citizens Advice Bureau. https://www.cas.org.uk/publications/internet-access-glasgows-deprived-areas
Rolling out Universal Credit (2018). National Audit Office, https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Rolling-out-Universal-Credit-Summary.pdf
Universal Support (2018). House of Commons Work and Pensions Committee, <nowiki>https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmworpen/1667/1667.pdf</nowiki>
===='''Case study 2: UC an individual case'''====
As has been discussed, the ability to make and maintain claims online is a central element of Universal Credit. Individuals with limited access to online facilities or who find new technology challenging are at a significant disadvantage. UC can also provide help with housing costs and a landlord portal is being distributed to social landlords. Evidence suggests, however, that the current DWP systems are not adequately developed. In particular, there is no alignment between deductions from UC and housing costs. This can lead to arrears and threaten tenancy sustainment and thus the right to housing. The below case-study from [https://www.melville.org.uk/ Melville Housing Association] is one of many that demonstrates the impacts of these issues upon an individual claiming their right to social security.
'''From Here to Uncertainty'''
A single man in his 50’s who was previously homeless was allocated a flat by a registered social landlord. He had problems with alcohol and substance abuse, as well as suffering from poor mental health. He was receiving Employment and Support Allowance (ESA), Personal Independence Payment (PIP), and, once allocated the property, claimed Housing Benefit (HB) and Council Tax Reduction (CTR).
Following a Department for Works and Pensions (DWP) health assessment he was found fit for work and therefore had to claim Universal Credit via the online system. He had no email address, no digital skills and limited access to online facilities and support.
When his ESA ended, it also stopped his HB leaving him with no idea what benefits to claim or how to claim them. With help from a tenancy support worker he got in touch with a welfare benefits adviser, provided by his landlord, who helped him challenge the ESA decision as well as make a claim for UC.
The process was not easy for him. He had limited identity documents, only a shared phone and a chaotic lifestyle which made it difficult to receive notifications and attend appointments. The local GP surgery was reluctant to let him register and he then faced difficulties contacting them to make appointments. The local Job Centre refused to see him as he was noted as aggressive and had to be seen behind a screen. This was only available at an alternative Job Centre that was several miles away and difficult for him to get to.
Without help to claim he would not have had any money to live on or to pay his rent and keep his flat. He has struggled continuously to maintain the UC claim. There were problems with the UC payments which were incorrectly calculated and he needed considerable help to access the journal and correct the mistakes.
He has recently lost his login details and phone and has been unable to maintain contact with the UC centre. He is at risk of suspension. He needs to travel to the alternative Job Centre to get help with this problem.
The need to login regularly has been a barrier in this case; he needs a great deal of support to maintain the claim and this is difficult due to the nature of the online process, especially the restrictive access and explicit consent requirements.
He has subsequently been found unfit for work, but must now remain on UC and will have to wait for the transitional protection rules to be introduced to receive full compensation (Severe Disability Premium).
Moving forward he is at serious risk of falling through the benefits safety net. His lack of digital skills and the restrictions placed on him by his local Job Centre mean that he is struggling to engage with the DWP. After finally finding a home following years of homelessness, he is now, once again at risk of losing the secure roof over his head.
===='''Case study 3: UC and gender'''====
[https://www.engender.org.uk/ There] is limited gender-disaggregated data for barriers to internet access in Scotland, [https://www.engender.org.uk/ Engender] highlight,however, that there is a clear correlation between low online participation and other areas of deprivation which are highly gendered. Women, for example, are the majority of older people, working-age people living in poverty, and lone parents. Women are also twice as dependent on social security as men, with 20% of women’s income coming from the benefits and tax credit system, compared with 10% of men’s.
Online security is also an issue for women experiencing domestic abuse. [https://www.engender.org.uk/ Engender] highlight that the online management of Universal Credit allows both members of a couple to access information about payments, appointments and other personal details, this will be extremely dangerous for some women. The issue of security must be thoroughly explored from this angle to prevent any unintended consequences. Whilst mindful of this, women at an Engender focus groups felt that greater online flexibilities would be useful, especially with regards to reducing complexity and confusion. An online profile, which would only be accessible by the applicant, with all information in one place was proposed as a potentially useful tool.
SCVO, Engender, Scottish Women's Aid and others also believe that household payments of UC by default are bad for gender equality. Women have a right to an independent income. Automatic split-payments would encourage the financial independence of women. In June 2018, of the 880,000 households on UC, just 20 received a split-payment. Reducing the economic inequality faced by women is essential to both realise their rights and achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
Similarly there is a need to revisit the sanctions and conditionality regime that accompanies Universal Credit which puts pressure on individuals to participate in employability activities incompatible with caring roles or to take on low-paid work below their skill level. Insufficient childcare provision also guarantees that some parents most often women, will be subject to sanctions, resulting in financial insecurity and extreme stress.
==== Work Programme ====
Problems with introducing new technologies into social security at a UK level are not unique to UC. The Department for Work & Pensions Work Programme, a scheme to help long-term unemployed people to find and keep jobs had similar challenges. The programme offered support to unemployed people claiming Jobseeker’s Allowance or Employment Support Allowance. Between June 2011 and March 2016, the Department expected to refer 2.1 million people to the Work Programme at a total cost of £2.8 billion (National Audit Office, 2014).
Due to tight timescales the Department did not pilot the programme. Policy decisions about the programme also overlapped design and development with the programme going live before IT was in place.
The result was a range of technical and training difficulties which had direct impacts on many of those referred to the programme.
Again the Programme was delivered by a range of private, public and voluntary sector organisations. In some cases this involved designing and building systems, such as a customer relationship management (CRM) system to detail, sanctions, barriers, and referral forms. While this involved a partnership the many partners involved were often not aware of the processes one another had in place or of their responsibilities. As a result the system was not always fully up-to-date which could result in confusion around if appointments were mandatory or voluntary, sanctions, and the wrong entitlements being delivered
The Work Programme (2014). National Audit Office <nowiki>https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/The-work-programme.pdf</nowiki>
The introduction of the work programme (2012). National Audit Office <nowiki>https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/10121701.pdf</nowiki>
===The Scottish Social Security system===
The Scottish Parliament passed the Social Security (Scotland) Act in April 2018. To deliver the new entitlements devolved from Westminster to Holyrood the Scottish Government establish a new agency, Social Security Scotland.
To create the digital infrastructure necessary to deliver the newly devolved entitlements the Scottish Government have followed the principles of Scotland’s digital strategy which promotes the reuse of existing solutions, rather than building of new bespoke systems (Audit Scotland, May 2019). Through utilising these principles alongside an Agile approach to design, the Scottish Government successfully identified and implemented the digital infrastructure necessary for wave one entitlements. The Agile approach also ensured systems were tested and adjusted before going live and that those affected by entitlements delivered by new systems were involved in their development, a central aspect of a rights-based approach. SCVO welcomes this approach and recognises that it addresses the failures of many previous major IT projects. SCVO also recognises the decision by Scottish Government to test new delivery systems on entitlements that involved one-off payments and smaller caseloads as a sensible one. The delivery of more complex entitlements is, however, likely to be a significant challenge.
The Scottish Government have stressed that the safe and secure transition of existing entitlements is their priority for the initial transition of entitlements from Westminster to Holyrood. While SCVO and colleagues across the third sector appreciate the need to ensure a smooth transition many colleagues across the sector share concerns that this has had an impact on the extent to which a rights-based approach has been implemented and transformatory change achieved.
The Scottish Government have the power to create new entitlements and to top-up existing entitlements. This power has been utilised to pay a Carers Allowance Supplement to carers living in Scotland and in receipt of Carer's Allowance to 77,000 people in 2018/19 (Audit Scotland, May 2019). The Scottish Government has also committed to delivering new forms of assistance including, a Young Carer Grant, a Job Grant, a more generous Best Start grant, and an Income Supplement. The implementation of the more complex new, Income Supplement, is still to take place and will not be introduced until 2022 at the earliest. SCVO and organisations across Scotland's third sector recognise that delivering these new entitlements is a significant additional undertaking. The latest figures show, however, that 20%, or over one million, people in Scotland lived in poverty after housing costs in 2015/18 (Poverty and income inequality in Scotland: 2015-2018). Organisations across the sector, including SCVO, the Poverty Alliance, and other members of the Scottish Campaign for Welfare Reform therefore stress that there is an urgent need to top- up the incomes of Scotland's poorest people, families and communities to fulfil their right to an adequate standard of living.
SCVO appreciate that to deliver on this commitment policies, processes, and systems, must be introduced. Digital technologies will be central to the development and delivery. However, the extent to which there has or will be detailed options appraisals and contingency plans for interim and long-term information technology (IT) components necessary for these entitlements is unclear. Audit Scotland, has raised these concerns and questioned the extent to which an Agile approach is compatible with more complex entitlements (Audit Scotland, May 2019).
Audit Scotland (2019) <nowiki>http://www.audit-scotland.gov.uk/uploads/docs/report/2019/nr_190502_social_security.pdf</nowiki>
Poverty and income inequality in Scotland: 2015-2018 (2019) <nowiki>https://www.gov.scot/publications/poverty-income-inequality-scotland-2015-18/pages/3/</nowiki>
===='''Case study 1: '''====
===='''Case study 2: '''====
===The introduction of digital technologies in UK and Scottish social security systems and human rights concerns===
===Lessons and solutions ===
As has been discussed, poorly designed and badly governed digital technologies within social protection system can have severe consequences for people and communities dependant on social security, particularly those in poverty. However, as [https://mydex.org/ Mydex CIC] highlight in their response, the application of digital technologies to social protection and other services can bring many benefits including cost savings, automation of processes, error reduction, and reduction in re-work. There is also potential for improved service provision, for example by creating digital service histories that inform decision-making, and collecting additional data over time that can enrich insights into the needs of individuals. Too often, however, systems and platforms are sold to the public sector and others, with the promise of these benefits and instead exacerbate existing problems while also creating new issues.
Mydex suggest that many of these issues arise because data is collected, stored and used in an ''organisation-centric'' way. An alternative system design where each individual has a personal data store (PDS), and all key data relating to the services they access and use is stored independently in this store, and where individuals can re-use and share this data when dealing with different organisations, would allow individuals to control their own data and ‘design out’ the duplication of effort for individuals who rely upon several social security service providers, such as the DWP, Social Security Scotland and local councils.
SCVO and Mydex suggest there is a needed for an IT infrastructure which empowers individuals dealing with service providers to access and use information in ways which streamline the process for the individual, reducing friction, effort, risk and cost.
The third sector have a strong record of working with hard to reach communities. Therefore the third sector should at the very least be in the mix for social security contracts. Furthermore Government must ensure the system is fit for purpose for whatever provider is contracted to carry out the work.
As social security increasingly relies upon new technologies such structures should ensure individuals do not give up some civil and political rights, such as the right to privacy, to exercise some of your socio-economic rights, such as the right to social security.
The causes of poverty are diverse and multifaceted. However, currently in both the UK and Scotland unequal access to the internet and digital devices... undermine rights and economic security. A co-ordinated vision to tackle poverty and inequality, realise rights and achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) is urgently needed. Central to this vision is a truly rights-based social security system in both Scotland and the UK, initiatives to address the digital divide, and an understanding of the impact that digital technologies within both Scottish and the UK social security systems can have on people and communities and their rights.
Social security systems are often designed to cater to the needs of all, based on common procedures and assumptions about how people will use a service and based on this, how the service can operate efficiently. Such approaches, as is the case for the digital by default approach to UC, often lack the necessary flexibility and resources to make a distinction between the different needs of individuals. To realise the right to social security and the right to an adequate standard of living Government's and the contractors they work with have a duty to ensure an accessible system that offers universal coverage while also equitably addresses each individuals needs.SCVO, Mydex and others across the Scottish third sector and civil society believe that as new technologies are increasingly implemented with in social security and other public services they can an must streamline process to avoid duplication of effort for both the individual and the state while also empowering individuals to control their own data. Digital by default is not and will not, however, be appropriate for all individuals. The digital divide is complex and there is a need to understand the many challenges digital access and skills present to people and communities across society.
The benefits of an Agile approach, involve those who will use the system in its design, and piloting programmes can not be underestimated.
Access, functionality, transparency and remain key areas of concern that must be address to ensure the right to social security is realised.
1) '''Access''': UC claimants may not have access to the internet or have the IT skills to manage their claims online;
2) '''Functionality''': errors are happening in the automated decision-making processes that are built into the UC system and the consequences are serious for claimants when they do not receive the financial support they are entitled to (hardship, destitution, homelessness);
3) '''Transparency'''; the UC online system does not provide claimants with enough information about their UC claim, how it has been calculated, and what to do if they don’t agree with a decision. This can make it difficult to identify and resolve errors when they have been made.